Psychotherapist and patient relationship centered

psychotherapist and patient relationship centered

The short stories he tells in his book eloquently and colorfully illustrate exactly how the relationship between patient and therapist can help people change. The therapeutic relationship between the practitioner and the patient is nature of many forms of client-centered and play therapy for children, and the social the therapeutic relationship and outcome in child psychodynamic psychotherapy, . How is the therapeutic alliance or therapist client relationship curative on its . of Person Centered counselling (which is theory based on 'the relationship') in.

Data Extraction For each included study, descriptive data regarding participants, interventions, and measures of alliance and outcome—as well as correlation data for alliance and outcomes—were extracted.

psychotherapist and patient relationship centered

Data Synthesis Thirteen studies including patients with brain injury, musculoskeletal conditions, cardiac conditions, or multiple pathologies were retrieved. Various outcomes were measured, including pain, disability, quality of life, depression, adherence, and satisfaction with treatment.

The alliance was most commonly measured with the Working Alliance Inventory, which was rated by both patient and therapist during the third or fourth treatment session. The results indicate that the alliance is positively associated with: Limitations Among homogenous studies, there were insufficient reported data to allow pooling of results.

Conclusions From this review, the alliance between therapist and patient appears to have a positive effect on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation settings; however, more research is needed to determine the strength of this association. The relationship between patient and therapist traditionally has been viewed as an important determinant of treatment outcome and is considered central to the therapeutic process.

The construct of the alliance in therapeutic situations is derived from theories of transference first outlined by Freud in and refers to the sense of collaboration, warmth, and support between the client and therapist.

Using this definition, researchers began to measure the alliance in clinical practice and formally assess its impact on treatment outcomes.

The majority of this evaluation has been conducted in psychology, counseling, or general medicine settings, where the intervention is typically centered on a one-to-one interaction between the patient and the treating physician or therapist.

Elvins and Green 13 recently conducted an extensive review to investigate the conceptualization and measurement of the alliance. They identified a broad consensus as to the key concepts of the alliance among the various measures, but no single unifying alliance model or a single measure that comprehensively addressed all of the key concepts. It would appear from the previous research that the alliance is positively associated with treatment outcome and could potentially be used as a predictor of treatment outcome in psychotherapy and general medicine settings.

However, the degree to which the alliance relates to outcome in other treatment settings is not clear. Physical rehabilitation, like psychotherapy and general medicine, includes a high level of patient-clinician interaction; however, the characteristics of the patient population, as well as the intervention, are arguably different.

It is plausible, therefore, that the relationship between the alliance and the outcome seen in psychotherapy or general medicine settings is not transferable to physical rehabilitation settings. It is thus of great importance to determine whether the alliance of rehabilitation therapists is similar to that of psychotherapists and general practitioners and whether this alliance influences outcome in the physical rehabilitation setting.

To our knowledge, there has been no systematic review of the primary research in this area. The aims of this study were: We hypothesized that the patient-therapist alliance would have a positive correlation with treatment outcome. Citation tracking was performed by manually screening reference lists of eligible trials. Theses and conference proceedings also were included.

Additionally, personal communication with content experts in the therapeutic alliance field was conducted. Study inclusion was not restricted by language. The search strategy and exclusion process are illustrated in the Figure. Single-case research is one method used to investigate this theoretical construct, but implies some methodological drawbacks regarding the simultaneous treatment of several factors, the need for an adequate number of repeated measurements, and the generalizability of results.

Meta-analysis is a possible research strategy that can be used to obtain the combined results of studies on the same topic. However, it is important to remember that meta-analysis is more valid when the effect being investigated is quite specific. According to Migoneanother hindrance is the so-called Rashomon effect named after the film by Akira Kurosawa: Di Nuovo et al.

Though designed by independent research teams, there is often good correlation between the scales used to rate the therapeutic alliance, which reveal that these instruments tend to assess the same underlying process Martin et al.

None of their findings suggest that any one instrument was a stronger predictor of outcome than the others, in relation to the type of therapy being considered. It is interesting to note that although almost all of these scales were originally designed to examine the perspective of only one member of the patient—therapist—observer triad, they were later extended or modified to rate perspectives that were not previously considered.

The number of items included in the scales varies considerably between 6 and itemsas do the dimensions of the alliance investigated e. According to Martin et al.

psychotherapist and patient relationship centered

Different approaches for the evaluation of alliance coexist in group psychotherapy. One of them is derived from individual psychotherapy.

Although a comparison between different treatment modalities is a topic beyond the scope of this paper, it is worth noting that in the late s, some authors Marmar et al. However, subsequently, Raue et al. This latter study compared 57 clients, diagnosed with major depression and receiving either psychodynamic—interpersonal or cognitive—behavioral therapy: They argue that these findings could reflect the effort in cognitive—behavioral therapy to give clients positive experiences and to emphasize positive coping strategies.

A more recent comparison was suggested by Spinhoven et al.

The Therapy Relationship – Key Ideas in Therapy (1/3)

Results obtained by evaluating alliance through WAI-Client and WAI-therapist after 3, 15, and 33 months, showed clear alliance differences between treatments, suggesting that the quality of the alliance was affected by the nature of the treatment.

Schema-focused therapy, with its emphasis on a nurturing and supportive attitude of therapist and the aim of developing mutual trust and positive regard, produced a better alliance according to the ratings of both therapists and patients. Ratings by therapists during early treatment, in particular, were predictive of dropout, whereas growth of the therapeutic alliance as experienced by patients during the first part of therapy, was seen to predict subsequent symptom reduction.

Phases of the Alliance during the Therapeutic Process and the Relationship with the Outcome There is much debate on the role of the therapeutic alliance during the psychotherapeutic process. It may in fact be a simple effect of the temporal progression of the therapy rather than an important causal factor. On the basis of this hypothesis, we would expect a development in the alliance to be characterized by a linear growth pattern over the course of the therapy, and alliance ratings obtained in the early phases to be weaker predictors of outcome than those obtained toward the end of the therapy.

However, according to the findings of numerous researchers, this is not the case. Horvath and Marx describe the course of the alliance in successful therapies as a sequence of developments, breaches, and repairs. According to Horvath and Symondsthe extent of the relationship between alliance and outcome was not a direct function of time: The results of these studies have led researchers to consider the existence of two important phases in the alliance.

The first phase coincides with the initial development of the alliance during the first five sessions of short-term therapy and peaks during the third session. During the first phase, adequate levels of collaboration and confidence are fostered, patient and therapist agree upon their goals, and the patient develops a certain degree of confidence in the procedures that constitute the framework of the therapy. The deterioration in the relationship must be repaired if the therapy is to be successful.

This model implies that the alliance can be damaged at various times during the course of therapy and for different reasons. The effect on therapy differs, depending on when the difficulty arises.

In this case, the patient may prematurely terminate the therapy contract. According to Safran and Segalmany therapies are characterized by at least one or more ruptures in the alliance during the course of treatment.

Randeau and Wampold analyses the verbal exchanges between therapist and patient pairs in high and low-level alliance situations and find that, in high-level alliance situations, patients responded to the therapist with sentences that reflected a high level of involvement, while in low-level alliance situations, patients adopted avoidance strategies.

Although some studies are based on a very limited number of cases, the results appear consistent: While recent theorists have stressed on the dynamic nature of the therapeutic alliance over time, most researchers have used static measures of alliance. There are currently several therapy models that consider the temporal dimension of the alliance, and these can be divided into two groups: Few studies have analyzed alliance at different stages in the treatment process.

According to the results proposed by Traceythe more successful the outcome, the more curvilinear the pattern of client and therapist session satisfaction high—low—high over the course of treatment.

When the outcome was worse, the curvilinear pattern was weaker. Kivlighan and Shaughnessy use the hierarchical linear modeling method an analysis technique for studying the process of change in studies where measurements are repeated to analyses the development of the alliance in a large number of cases. According to their findings, some dyads presented the high—low—high pattern, others the opposite, and a third set of dyads had no specific pattern, although there appeared to be a generalized fluctuation in the alliance during the course of treatment.

In recent years, researchers have analyzed fluctuations in the alliance, in the quest to define patterns of therapeutic alliance development. Kivlighan and Shaughnessy distinguish three patterns of therapeutic alliance development: They based their analysis on the first four sessions of short-term therapy and focused their attention on the third pattern, in that this appeared to be correlated with the best therapeutic outcomes.

In further studies of this development pattern, Stiles et al. Unlike Kivlighan and Shaughnessy, these authors considered therapies consisting of 8 and 16 sessions, using the ARM to rate the therapeutic bond, partnership, and confidence, disclosure, and patient initiative. No significant correlation was observed between any of the four patterns and the therapeutic outcome.

However, the authors observed a cycle of therapeutic alliance rupture—repair events in all cases: On the basis of this characteristic, the authors hypothesize that the V-shaped alliance patterns may be correlated with positive outcomes. In particular, Stiles et al. The results of the study by De Roten et al. According to De Roten et al. De Roten et al.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

According to Castonguay et al. This has supported the idea that therapeutic alliance may be characterized by a variable pattern over the course of treatment, and led to the establishment of a number of research projects to study this phenomenon. Discussion and Conclusion According to their meta-analysis based on the results of 24 studies, Horvath and Symonds demonstrate the existence of a moderate but reliable association between good therapeutic alliance and positive therapeutic outcome.

More recent meta-analyses of studies examining the linkage between alliance and outcomes in both adult and youth psychotherapy Martin et al. Thus, it is not by chance that in their meta-analysis, Horvath and Luborsky conclude that two main aspects of the alliance were measured by several scales regardless of the theoretical frameworks and the therapeutic models: This accounts for the difficulties associated with the concept of alliance, which is built interactively, and so any assessment must also consider the mutual influence of the participants.

In a helpful contribution, Hentschel points out that the problematic aspect of empirical studies investigating the alliance is their tendency to view the alliance construct as a treatment strategy and a predictor of therapeutic outcome: The use of neutral observers or the creation of counterintuitive studies is therefore recommended. From this historical excursus, it is clear that research into the assessment of the psychotherapeutic process is alive and well.

The development of a dynamic vision of the concept of therapeutic alliance is also apparent. The work of theorists and researchers has contributed toward enriching the definition of therapeutic alliance, first formulated in Research aimed at analyzing the components that make up the alliance continues to flourish and develop.

Numerous rating scales have been designed to analyses and measure the therapeutic alliance, scales that have enabled us to gain a better understanding of the various aspects of the alliance and observe it from different perspectives: Attention has recently turned toward the role of the therapeutic alliance in the various phases of therapy and the relationship between alliance and outcome.

So far, few studies have regarded long-term psychotherapy involving many counseling sessions.

Person-centered therapy

This topic, along with a more detailed examination of the relationship between the psychological disorder being treated and the therapeutic alliance, will be the subject of future research projects.

Equally important, in our opinion, will be the findings of studies regarding drop-out and therapeutic alliance ruptures, which must necessarily consider the differences between that perceived by the patient and that perceived by the therapist. Conflict of Interest Statement The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Acknowledgments The authors thank Mauro Adenzato for his valuable comments and suggestions to an earlier version of this article.

A Research Handbook, eds Greenberg L. Guilford Press;— Bibring E. On the theory of the results of psychoanalysis. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory. Routledge and Kegan Paul Budman S.

Person-centered therapy - Wikipedia

Cohesion, alliance and outcome in group psychotherapy. Psychiatry 52, — [ PubMed ] Burlingame G. Cohesion in group therapy. Is therapist alliance or whole group cohesion more influential in group psychotherapy outcomes? Is one assessment enough? Patterns of helping alliance development and outcome.