Companion Animal Psychology: Cats and Dogs
Dogs and cats have a range of interactions. The natural instincts of each species lead towards antagonistic interactions, though individual animals can have. Apparently cats appear to be much easier to hate. Certainly the relationship between cats and humans has always been quite different than the to confirm the findings of some research that I did for my book Why We Love The Dogs We Do. Dog people are more socially dominant than cat people, but what does it mean? Is this a complementary relationship? . yet is whether dog people are generally prejudiced against cats and the people who love them.
The first incorporated traits such as activeness, intelligence, curiousness and sociability. The second seemed to be driven by how emotional, friendly and protective the cats were.
Love-Hate Relationship: Golden Retriever and Cat Engage in Confusing Battle - Sputnik International
Component three consisted of aggression and bad-temperedness, and component four was moderated by timidness. So it would seem that cats can have different personalities too — at least, based on the reports of their owners.
Or maybe it's just down to emotional bonds being established between owners and their pets.
The stereotypical cat is often seen as a highly aloof animal which isn't particularly interested in human contact. But a study by Claudia Edwards and colleagues in the Journal of Veterinary Behaviour looked at attachment in cats, and found behaviour consistent with that which you would see in young children.
Attachment theory was developed in the late s as way of characterising affectionate bonds between two individuals, one of which is usually a caregiver.
The creation of such a bond between a parent and child, for instance, makes it more likely that the child's basic needs are met, and the child tends to relax around the caregiver. On the other hand, if the child is placed in the company of a strangerthey might become more anxious, upset with their caregiver, or distressed in some way.
Similarly, Edwards' study found that when cats were in the company of their owners, they tended to show more relaxed attachment behaviours such as wandering around, exploring and playing in their environment. When they were placed with a stranger instead, the cats meowed less, and spent more time waiting by the door.
So maybe cats aren't as aloof as we first thought. Cats and health It's often suggested that having a pet can improve your mood, however research from suggests that the relationship is a bit more complicated than that.
Dennis Turner and colleagues looked at how the presence of cats in the home affected positive and negative moods, and how this compared to the presence of a partner. They found that having a cat only appeared to affect negative moods — i. It was only the presence of a partner that appeared to enhance positive moods. A more controversial issue around whether cats affect our mood centres on a parasite called Toxoplasma gondii.
Dog–cat relationship - Wikipedia
There are lots of ways in which it can be transmitted, including through exposure to cat feces, and while for the most part T. For example, studies on people who are diagnosed with schizophrenia have been shown to have a higher number of T. That being said, the answer is probably not to get rid of your cat.
While cats are an important part of the sexual cycle of T.HOW TO UNDERSTAND YOUR CAT BETTER
Illustration of a Japanese cat cemetery. Even in the West there are plenty of people who feel no particular affinity for animals, whether pets or no. The pet-keeping habit often runs in families: Some people, whatever their upbringing, seem predisposed to seek out the company of animals, others less so. So the genes that promote pet-keeping may be unique to humans, but they are not universal, suggesting that in the past some societies or individuals — but not all — thrived due to an instinctive rapport with animals.
Pet lovers of the future. Yes, this was also when we started breeding livestock. But it is not easy to see how this could have been achieved if those first dogs, cats, cattle and pigs were treated as mere commodities.
Love-Hate Relationship: Golden Retriever and Cat Engage in Confusing Battle
But if at least some of these early domestic animals had been treated as pets, physical containment within human habitations would have prevented wild males from having their way with domesticated females; special social status, as afforded to some extant hunter-gatherer pets, would have inhibited their consumption as food.
The pug — a long way removed from its ancestors. Penguin, Author provided The very same genes which today predispose some people to take on their first cat or dog would have spread among those early farmers.